Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

the conspiracy of the ringbearer

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Conspiracy Central >> the conspiracy of the ringbearer
Jump to post #:
Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/4/2008 7:03:17 PM   
OneJohn410


Posts: 1512
Joined: 6/1/2008
Status: offline
I have discovered something that exists without ever seeing it.

It is an agreement, unspoken, between those who wear wedding bands and such and those just purchasing them.

I'm not positive on the wording yet, but it is something like this:

"In the company of someone you do not know well, congratulations! This ring gives you several options.

You can outright ask the other person if they are married, at which time you display your ring.

You can ask and not display your left hand, simply wait for their response first.

You can keep your left hand out of view and see if they work to determine the answer for themselves without asking first (a favorite in our recent poll).

In this last instance, you can ask them "What? Is something wrong?"

Then there's a contact address or such for people to send in their stories and such.


That's my theory. There are some guidelines with the engagement/wedding band that suggest the wearer really have fun and not annoy but make those around them work just a little bit.

This is targeted to singles out there, but if you're married and just can't help yourself, by all means, please post as well.

OneJohn410

_____________________________

For everything that was written in the past was written to teach us, so that through endurance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope. -Romans 15:4 (NIV)
Post #: 1
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/4/2008 7:22:28 PM   
ta_mosquito


Posts: 11446
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: from MN, now in Ontario :D
Status: offline
Huh?

So are you saying that those who are married (and wear rings) play games with single people to make them guess whether they're married or not?

Uhh, nope.

I use my hands the exact same way I did when I wore no ring. I don't even think about whether the man behind me in line is wondering whether or not I'm single.

No games here.

_____________________________

Tricia

"There's a fine line between being open-minded and empty-headed." ~Michael Coren
Post #: 2
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/6/2008 11:18:56 AM   
IonMoon


Posts: 838
Joined: 4/21/2005
From: The Unted State of Confusion
Status: offline
You lost me as well. In 20 years of marriage and a few years before of engagement, I have sometimes worn a ring and sometimes not. Not with any intention as to what people would think, but for reasons of convenience, comfort, etc. And I have never acted differently in any way with or without one.

I don't pay much attention if ANY as to whether other people are wearing rings, because I know as many married people who don't wear them as I do those who do; AND I have known a number of people who are unmarried, but wear bands/rings on their left ring finger either because they like the look or because they work in a field where they prefer to have people think they are unavailable or they were married and still wear the ring. So, I just never assumed that a ring or lack of one was a good indicator as to whether or not someone was married.

The only "game" I have seen people play is when women are first engaged, they tend to display their hands until people notice the new ring...

Tara P

_____________________________

http://www.geocities.com/hallscola67/KyliesHomemadeShopIndex.htm
Post #: 3
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/7/2008 5:47:30 PM   
OneJohn410


Posts: 1512
Joined: 6/1/2008
Status: offline
I have two votes against any such participation in this theory. I had considered the action to wear something on that finger to visually say 'I'm unavailable, etc.' I had not heard about people not wearing on as much as others wearing them before. There are jobs in which you don't want to be wearing a ring, that's for certain.

Okay, there's no one willing to say they give singles a challenging time about their marital status. That's good to hear.
Post #: 4
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/8/2008 1:58:40 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7627
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
Darn, I read the title to this thread and I thought it was a Lord of the Rings discussion.

_____________________________

Jack

I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
- C.S. Lewis
Post #: 5
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/8/2008 5:26:15 PM   
ta_mosquito


Posts: 11446
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: from MN, now in Ontario :D
Status: offline
LOL!

_____________________________

Tricia

"There's a fine line between being open-minded and empty-headed." ~Michael Coren
Post #: 6
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/8/2008 8:31:28 PM   
Dancre


Posts: 1307
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
Pouts!! Me too!! Now I'm disappointed. Sigh . . .


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

Darn, I read the title to this thread and I thought it was a Lord of the Rings discussion.
Post #: 7
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/8/2008 8:33:57 PM   
Dancre


Posts: 1307
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
Well, since this isn't about LOTR, I'll jump in. As a single, I have come across guys who don't wear their wedding ring in order to cheat on their wives. It's always best to see if there is a white line around the bottom of the finger, were the ring normally is worn.

quote:

ORIGINAL: OneJohn410

I have two votes against any such participation in this theory. I had considered the action to wear something on that finger to visually say 'I'm unavailable, etc.' I had not heard about people not wearing on as much as others wearing them before. There are jobs in which you don't want to be wearing a ring, that's for certain.

Okay, there's no one willing to say they give singles a challenging time about their marital status. That's good to hear.
Post #: 8
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/9/2008 10:28:31 AM   
stamper_ben


Posts: 10366
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lone Star State
Status: offline
I not only have the tan line where my ring is, there is also an indentation in the finger!

_____________________________

We will be known as His by the love we show one another.
Post #: 9
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/13/2008 9:01:35 PM   
SuspenseWriter


Posts: 470
Joined: 2/22/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stamper_ben

I not only have the tan line where my ring is, there is also an indentation in the finger!


Me too (thirty-five years married). I only take off my ring when I'm going to be doing manual labor; afterward, on it goes again. I'm proud to wear it, even though it's looking mighty worn after all these years!

_____________________________

John Robinson
writer of suspense...obviously!
www.johnrobinsonbooks.com
http://www.johnrobinsonbooks.com/my-journal/
Post #: 10
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/13/2008 10:29:43 PM   
LivingParadox


Posts: 924
Joined: 2/28/2007
Status: offline
Gee, I was even contemplating whether I wanted to be Samwise or Frodo.
Post #: 11
RE: the conspiracy of the ringbearer - 10/27/2008 1:12:23 AM   
SonInMe1

 

Posts: 3164
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: my mom by God
Status: offline
I was going to midweek services. I did not wear my wedding ring because I go to work after church. I noticed...women sitting next to me...it seemed single women.

I started wearing my wedding ring. Probably just my ego but I know...single men in church are more rare than a pro-life democrat.

_____________________________

You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.

James 4:4
Post #: 12
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Conspiracy Central >> the conspiracy of the ringbearer
Jump to post #:
Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI